![]() ![]() Look, seriously, I don’t think you realize that every time there is a post of yours, certain people can get lazy if they want to start reading it, because it doesn’t contribute anything, nor does it help anyone, it just makes the situation more dizzy and it seems that you look for protagonism wherever you go, instead to want to really be of help (because you are not helpful at all). But for you to flat out say I’m not getting it and that is’ the consumer’s problem and consumer’s responsibility to fix an issue multiple people are experiencing, well, if that’s how you want to portray how you deal with your consumers, then that’s how it goes I guess. “YOU need to look for the cause”.Īs far as “further confirmation I also have an add on compatibility issue”, how do you explain the F-16 smoke working when I did not remove a single add on? “Reporting this info does not help in anyway”. Instead, “you obviously aren’t getting it”. I would assume going out of my way to provide feedback, information that I find conflicting in hopes people smarter than myself can figure out what I cannot, would be appreciated.įor example I think Rattman going out of his way to provide feedback, and go out of his way to test other aircraft with smoke to try and help the people who get money for this product figure out a solution, is something that should be praised and shown gratitude for. Smoke wasn’t working, and I wasn’t rude about it, I simply pointed it out, similar to how multiple other people said smoke wasn’t working for them either. The people who receive money, they are not responsible. So if a consumer buys a product, and the product feature does not work as advertised, you suggest it is the consumer that needs to look for the cause. The jet smoke has always worked perfectly? There are several users who would disagree. There’s something wrong, and as to the cause of it, I have yet to discover it therefor you do not need to put words/opinions that I never stated and then argue against it. You say “bug of the F-16” as if I said it was a bug of the F-16. Try running the jet with a CLEAN community folder… SC/DC is not responsible The jet smoke has always worked perfectly, and if it doesn’t YOU need to look for the cause. You reporting to us all of this info does NOT help in any way, as its not a “bug” of the f-16. The issue is on your end, and there is zero way of us troubleshooting your issue.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |